Archive for January, 2009

Filter

By Month
By Kind

Doing Things to be Doing Things

Jan
30

Disclaimer: Being a mere eighteen years of age, I am perhaps not the most qualified person to be writing this. Further disclaimer: I’m not a very good writer. Proceed with caution.

I know I was supposed to post my iLife ’09 review today, but as I was walking home from work, this seemed like a much better post. The iLife review is coming, just not today.

I was chatting with a friend online, playing the “I’ve Never” game and generally shooting the breeze. In doing so, I discovered that, despite not having led a crazy childhood, or a wild series of teenage years, I have actually done a lot of interesting things. I’ve climbed a mountain, gone rock climbing, randomly explored the corporate sector of downtown Calgary and chased down exotic car meets to chat with the owners. It’s not much, but it builds something I’ll call “experience equity.” If Gary Vaynerchuk can lay claim to the legacy > currency thing, I’ll throw in my vote for experience equity.

Experience equity is the value of all of your significant and insignificant life experiences. It is that collective value that is greater than any currency in the world. To sum it up, it is doing things for the sake of doing things.

Next time you have a day off, promise me you’ll go and do something you haven’t done before. Those train journeys? They’re never really planned in advance. I typically try to spend any day I have off to go and do something, anything. We only play this game once, and I think that trying to cram as much stuff into it is a wise move. Every single person (with the means, of course) should have a savings account for random occasions. I have one. I don’t dip into it for day-to-day purchases, for big purchases, or for schooling. It’s exclusively for what many deem a rainy day. For me, it’s usually a sunny day. At any rate, it’s a great way to build experience equity. 

For example, being a native Calgarian, there is virtually no legitimate reason to pay twelve dollars to visit the observation deck of the Calgary Tower. But it’s a nice thing to do, and it builds experience equity. Likewise, there’s no reason to pay $2.50 to visit the south end of the city via public transit and to film it. However, I saw things that I hadn’t before. I saw kids enjoying a bright, sunny day sledding. I saw people taking dogs for a walk, and others cycling. In January, in Calgary. Said individually, it sounds like I’m simply easily amused. But I can guarantee that it was a truly fantastic experience. Perhaps it wasn’t life-changing, but it was interesting.

I enjoy doing things because I can. Because doing things makes me feel like a better person. Because nobody can be an interesting person without the experiences to back it up. Hustle. Go rock climbing, just for a few hours. Drive to a nearby small town and have lunch at a local café. Go to bed early and wake up ultra-early to watch the sun rise in a deserted place (and bring a camera). While you’re at it, bring a friend, too.

Always remember: no matter how clichéd it is, quality is greater than quantity. I would rather die at 50 but have been constantly hustling and doing things, than dying at 100 and having no experience equity.

January 30, 2009

Of Genres and Tags

Jan
18

I have a completely tagged iTunes library. After several hours split between the previous two days, I have looked at every song in my library, every single one of the 12,332 songs that I have, and ensured that the song title, artist, album and genre are all correct. And in doing so, I have discovered that the current method of classifying albums and songs is, at best, woefully outdated. More realistically, it’s an empty and meaningless endeavor.

The idea of placing albums, and indeed artists into categories came naturally with the invention of the record store. You could walk to the jazz section and find The Rat Pack, the classical section would hold timeless Beethoven and Schubert records, and the rock section would have the “raucous” sounds of Elvis Presley (in the ’50′s) and The Beatles (in the ’60′s). It was a simple solution for rather simple music, and I do mean simple. At the time there were standards to uphold. There were no mashup albums, and the difference in perceived loudness between different rock and roll artists would be scoffed at in modern times.

The genre method has continued right up to this day. There’s still a genre column in iTunes, and just about every music store still has everything categorized in this fashion. But music has changed in the last 50-60 years. New genres have appeared seemingly overnight. There are a variety of electronic genres, for starters – everything from chill, ambient music to hard core trance. While Dashboard Confessional and Metallica are both rock, you’d be hard-pressed to find a tonal or stylistic similarity between the two. And don’t even get started on mashup artists like Girl Talk and Audiobytes for Autobots, who both blur genres until there’s nothing left but a sea of sound. With GarageBand, a microphone and a MySpace page, one can create a niche genre for themselves before they can think of a name for it. Times have changed. So should the method by which we sort our music.

Genres are much too vague. There are far too many catch-all genres (electronic, rock, jazz, pop, et. al.), and lines are being crossed all the time. For some artists, a simple “rock” tag will suffice. However, that artist then becomes the basis for what defines “rock” as a genre in your library. You may tag Bon Jovi’s collection as “rock”, but then later, stumble upon David Usher. And it is at this point where you will start to question the definition of “rock”, as relative to Bon Jovi. Is David Usher’s music hard enough? Is the tone right? Is it too hard to be “rock”, and more of a “metal” album? (no, it is not). Quite simply, it becomes difficult to tag such a wide variety of music with so few tags.

This is why I would like a new field in iTunes. I mean, we can keep the genre field, because it’s great for getting a broad overview of an artist or album. But there should be a new field, called “Tags.” In this field, you could write a list of tags, similar to how you would tag a blog entry, a photo on Flickr or a video on YouTube. You could write whatever you want in the tag field – everything from “indie”, “jazzy” and “rockin’” to “upbeat”, “gibson les paul” and “recorded in New York”. In this way, you can search your library based on the keywords you choose. Your music library is freed from the constraints of genres and moved into a more accurate, more correct way of categorization.

I think I should send an email to Apple now…

January 18, 2009

Flip Mino HD

Jan
11

A Mino in Canada

Getting the Flip into Canada was an adventure in its own right. Since it isn’t actually available here, I posted a note on Facebook asking any American friends if they could forward a package for me. Luckily, one responded. It took a good while to get here, but it was definitely worth the wait.

I have held to a firm belief for a long time: if you’re taking candid photos, it’s about 25% more work to take a candid video, but you’ll reap 100% more rewards. Photos are fantastic little things, but it’s simply more interesting to watch a video than flick through a photo album, especially on the internet. It is with this belief that I purchased a Flip Mino HD, which isn’t actually available in Canada (see sidebar for more info). The camera arrived Monday, January 4th and I started playing with it immediately. Read on for a more in-depth review of this amazingly small camcorder.

I ripped open the package rather eagerly upon arrival. Unfortunately, I didn’t get the unboxing of it on video (or in photos), but this guy did, so if you want to watch a guy unwrapping a product on video, that link is for you. For those who want to read my blog instead, here’s a quick run-down. The packaging is very Apple-esque, with lots of detail on the opening of the product. It’s almost like opening a gift. The camera sits in a little tray, almost like that of the iPhone package. It’s odd – no amount of comparison photos or YouTube videos give you a sense of the size of this camera: it’s tiny! It’s about the same height as my iPod touch, about 70% of the width and a little bit thicker, and it records 720p video. Annoyingly, the camcorder either discharged during shipment or is shipped almost completely uncharged, so I had to charge it before I could test the image quality.

The video quality on this camera is, in a word, mindblowing (that’s probably two words, actually). For something this small, I was impressed at the sharpness and detail in the resulting test videos. I edited together a (cheesy) test video to show it off:

Unsurprisingly, the Flip video lineup has been successful. At the time of writing, the Flip occupies the top three spots for all camcorders sold on Amazon. At first glance, this is odd to any of you who have read the specs for the Mino. The zoom is only a 2x digital zoom (which just stretches the image instead of changing the actual lens zoom), there’s no still image support (not until the editing phase, anyway) and you can only store an hour of footage with the non-expandable memory. It also doesn’t have anything approaching advanced features. You can’t set the white balance or focus and there’s no way to switch between SD and HD recording. However, and this is the key to its success, there’s no pretentiousness associated with this camera. It’s like an old Mini. There’s no air conditioning, no luxuries, the engine is about as powerful as a mouse on a wheel and it’s too small. But it has personality and is admired for being simple transport for (usually) simple people. The Mino has drawbacks aplenty, but it’s ridiculously simple. You push the power button on the side and, before you can say “Flip Mino HD”, it’s ready for you to push the big red button on the back and start recording. It’s the best camera for social gatherings. No need to lug around the Handycam with tapes and a flip-out screen. The Flip fits in your pocket next to your cell phone and headphones and is ready to record at a moment’s notice, for those times when your friends start playing a round of beer pong.

Admittedly, there are one or two improvements that I’d like to see made. The first deals with a little thing that can make recording a big problem – the screen. It’s about the same size as the screen on a first-generation iPod nano. Even worse, it’s a fullscreen ratio for recording in widescreen. The makers of the Flip have attempted to justify this odd choice by putting the battery and recording information in the black bars on the top and bottom, but it’s still a stupid choice. The Mino HD should have the lens turned 90° and a proper widescreen placed on the back, rather like the new iPod nano (imagine the click wheel as the recording controls). It’s an odd design choice, and it could be a deal-breaker for some of you.

The second problem is more minor. Since the camera is essentially an extension of your hand (and lacks image stabilization), it records every little twitch of your hand in beautiful HD. You can probably see that the video above looks like “Cloverfield” as seen from a Starbucks location. Happily, the new version of iMovie will have a stabilization feature, which I can’t wait to get my (shaky) hands on.

In conclusion, the Flip Mino HD is an incredible little camera, marred only by a few faults. These faults might not be a deal-breaker if you want to get the absolute best quality footage of your drunk friends at a college party. And since Facebook and YouTube (amongst other sites) now show HD, it’s a great time to buy. In short, the Flip is the iPod of camcorders. It doesn’t do anything truly new or revolutionary, and lacks features that competitors have. However, it does everything it can do in the best, most elegant fashion.

January 11, 2009

Cross-Posting

Jan
05

A post from about a month ago on joestump.net is incredibly critical of cross-posting. Mr. Stump disagrees that Twitter can be used for anything except 140-character posts that let him know what the user is doing. I disagree with this viewpoint, mainly after looking at my blog statistics for the first 14 hours of the launch of the site:

referrals

As you can see, the first is from my old blog (which isn’t cross posting – that’s just about 40-odd subscribers checking out the new site). My blog feeds to Facebook and to Twitter, and you can see that the second and third referrers were exactly those two.

January 5, 2009